I'm rarely ticked off but today after getting 3 notes about someone notifying DA that three of my devs were in violation, I was a bit ticked. At first because I would have been most happy to add the stupid "mature" warning myself, instead of wasting an admins time, because one of the deviations they reported already had the mark and dA felt it wasn't in violation of anything other than what I noted. But second, I started thinking, ok the pics did have nudity, but it's not like anything was showing! It's like they were explicit in anyway. It's not anything you wouldn't find in any Princess Sally fanart.

And then I got to thinking, why don't people who draw Sally fanart get slapped with violation notes and have some admin come in and mark your art as "mature"? And the second thought was, "Well, she is wearing shoes at least...."

So here you have it. The rule about nudity and furry characters. Shoes = Not Nude. Emerald's apparently well aware of it. XD

This WON'T be marked as mature, because it's nothing you wouldn't find on the old Saturday morning Sonic cartoon, and it's nothing you won't find in the current Archie publication of the Sonic the Hedgehog series, which is printed and available for anyone to buy in any store (that sells coimc books). If a pair of cartoon boobs is really that big a deal, mark yourself as immature and get on with your life.

Edit: For people who keep saying "Doesn't Sally wear a vest too?" here's some screenshots I got off the internet, as well as one shot of her SHOELESS in the Comic and a really awesome drawing by J Axer just cause I like it.
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]